Eagle with Stars and Stripes
Continuously serving Kosciusko County since 1854

City Council OKs Sewer Rate Hike On 5-2 Vote

Posted

For the second time in as many months, the Warsaw City Council Monday approved on first reading an ordinance establishing new sewer rates by a vote of 5-2.

The second reading and the coinciding public hearing on the new proposal will be at 7 p.m. Nov. 20 at city hall. An ordinance must pass on two separate readings to be approved.

At the Oct. 16 city council meeting, by a vote of 4-3, the board defeated the original proposal on second reading. During a special meeting Oct. 27, the council reached a consensus to move forward with a new proposal for Monday’s meeting.

The only difference between the new proposal and the first one is the charge for maintaining the billing department. The billing component would be reduced to the number of bills a multi-family unit receives. In a four-unit multi-family, where only one bill is provided for all four units, there would be one billing fee of $3.79.

The flow rate, based on 4,800 gallons, is $5.65 per 1,000 gallons, a 20 percent increase over the 2008 rate. There also is a charge for the collection system of $8.21.

Therefore, based on 4,800 gallons, a single-family home would pay $39.12 monthly; the first unit of a four-unit dwelling would pay $39.12; and the other three units would pay $35.33. That fee structure would be extrapolated out to the number of units.

While the new ordinance reduces a charge multi-family dwellings would pay, it could potentially leave the city short more than $111,000 per year in revenue needed to cover expenses of both phases of the project.

By the council approving the new proposal Monday, Randy Rompola, with Barnes & Thornburg, bond counsel, said it could not re-introduce the proposal that was defeated Oct. 16 because that would be an increase in rates over what will be advertised for the public hearing on Nov. 20.

The city is looking at a $41 million sewer project, including $10 million in improvements to sewer lines and manholes in phase I. Bids for those improvements were opened Friday during the Board of Public Works and Safety meeting.

Phase II would be a $30 million expansion of the city’s wastewater treatment plant, which is mandated by the state that would be funded with another proposed increase in the sewer rate.

After Mayor Joe Thallemer turned the meeting over to the council for discussion on the sewer rate, Council President Mike Klondaris asked Jeffrey P. Rowe, H.J. Umbaugh & Associates partner, “Should we pass an ordinance where every dwelling unit doesn’t have to pay $3.79, you came up with a rough number of $100,000 (in lost revenue). Were you able to come up with something a little more accurate maybe? That is a concern. We have to pay for this.”

Rowe said, “The total amount is just over $111,000 annually. So, to the extent that this ordinance would move forward, then there would need to be some consideration made with the second phase part of the project, a second phase increase to account for that reduction of $111,000. Got to make it up.”

Councilman Ron Shoemaker asked if the problem was that the city’s rates were not sufficient to spread the costs out equitably. Homes on wells are being charged for 4,800 gallons, when he said the average is more like 4,200 and trending downward. Shoemaker said he got those figures from Indiana American Water Company. “I would think there’s someway to make this an equitable distribution other than somebody saying I’m paying less and someone paying more,” he said.

Rowe said as the city moves forward with transitioning billing from a flat rate to a metered rate, there will have to be some discussion on usage patterns. To the extent that usage goes down, “any reduction in revenuethat occurs, it would have to be made up somehow,” he said.

Councilwoman Diane Quance said the bids for the sewer pipes came in nearly $3 million below the $10 million projected cost, which is what the city is bonding for. She asked how that will affect what they’re doing.

“The ordinance that’s before you this evening, and the ordinance that had been introduced before you, assumes a $10 million bond,” Rowe said. “So ... we would recommend continuing along that path. If the city decides to bond for less than the $10 million, then that would mean the second phase increase may not be as high as what we originally anticipated. So, again, that would also depend on how bids come in on the second phase.”

He said the interest rates are based on the $10 million.

Quance asked if the leftover from phase I could be applied toward phase II. Rowe said it’s limited to the first phase, so some of the alternates on the sewer pipe work could be added in to get closer to the $10 million.

Quance said she was asking because people were talking about being worried about recouping money that may not even be needed because the bids came in under the projected cost.

Rowe responded, “We’re speculating, that’s one thing that’s being speculated in terms of how much additional revenue would have to be recovered. Again, we have the largest portion of the project coming next year. Who knows what the debt environment will be, who knows exactly what interest rates will be? Who knows exactly what the change in usage pattern will be? There’s a lot of moving pieces and parts, and still some unknowns at this part. Depending on how all those things play out will ultimately influence the final rate increase.”

Councilman Jerry Frush, who voted against the new ordinance along with Klondaris, read a two-page prepared statement. In part, he said, “I cannot in good conscience support the idea that homeowners and people living in rental units pay different usage charges for wastewater treatment. I have heard landlords and some on the council argue that because every rental unit is not connected individually and receive a bill, they should not pay as much as private homeowners. Rental units use the same sewage pipes as the rest of us. There is no reason they should not pay their fair share to keep the system working correctly. The landlords have cried foul because they have set their rent and now it will cut into their profits. This is known as the cost of doing business. I have no doubt that by the time this takes effect in at least half of the rental units they will already have had the opportunity to adjust their rents to compensate for the change.”

Councilman Jeff Grose reiterated his stance that he believes every dwelling unit should receive a sewage bill, but said he knew he couldn’t convince the council or the community of his suggestion, so he was in favor of the new ordinance.

Klondaris said the new ordinance throws out the idea of the rate being equitable. He also said the increase was only $2 more a month (for collection and billing charges) and he couldn’t understand why someone couldn’t pay that.

City Planner Jeremy Skinner reiterated his point from the last council meeting, saying, “I’m going to be honest, and I think I said this on the 27th, you guys are so far in the weeds, I don’t think you can get out. You’re down there too far.”

Though Klondaris said he’d like to see the new proposal rejected, Councilmen Quance, Grose, Jack Wilhite, Cindy Dobbins and Shoemaker voted in favor of it.

The council has to approve the rates by its Nov. 20 meeting to qualify for about $1 million in State Revolving Fund dollars.